Skip to content
DrugCard Science
Review

Published · Updated · 2 min read

Morphine after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pain reduction did not exceed the MCID

What it means for practice

When considering morphine as an addition to multimodal analgesia, note that lower pain scores were statistically significant, but the mean difference did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference.

Summary

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at a sports surgery center compared two analgesic protocols after primary isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Each matched group included 556 patients. The opioid group received oral morphine sulfate as needed in addition to multimodal analgesia; the non-opioid group received multimodal analgesia alone. Listed components of multimodal analgesia included paracetamol, nefopam, and ketoprofen.

Key findings

Adding morphine was associated with lower pain scores during the first 3 postoperative days. On day 0, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were 5.6 ± 2.7 in the non-opioid group (n = 536/556) versus 5.3 ± 2.7 in the opioid group (n = 522/556; p = 0.0339). On day 1, the corresponding values were 5.2 ± 2.4 (n = 545/556) and 4.8 ± 2.4 (n = 543/556; p = 0.0014).

Dizziness on day 0 was more frequent without morphine: 100/536 patients (18.7%) versus 70/522 (13.4%; p = 0.0236). There was a trend toward more complications in the non-opioid group: 11/556 (2.0%) versus 3/556 (0.5%; p = 0.0558), mainly due to Cyclops syndrome and knee stiffness. Reoperation rates were similar (p > 0.05).

Clinical relevance

Despite statistical significance, the mean difference in VAS scores did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Lower pain scores therefore should not be equated with an established clinically important benefit from adding morphine.

Source

  1. Moussa MK, Mrabet F, Valentin E, et al. Impact of Morphine on Early Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study. Cureus. 2026;18(9):e117127. doi:10.7759/cureus.117127

    PubMed 42959591 DOI 10.7759/cureus.117127 Original: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Reviewed by: DrugCard editorial team ·

This article does not replace clinical judgement. Disclaimer